This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this folio. Terms of utilize.

The star KIC 8462852 sits 1,480 light years away in the constellation Cygnus. It'due south an unassuming object at first glance, simply information technology became a hot topic in astronomy concluding twelvemonth when data from the planet-hunting Kepler telescope showed something causing fluctuations in the light coming from KIC 8462852 (nicknamed Tabby's Star, afterward the astronomer who led the original squad). It wasn't a planet, and some speculated that what we were seeing was prove of a massive alien megastructure.

As much as scientists have tried to come up upwards with a more plausible cause, Tabby's Star continues to defy explanation. A new report now confirms that in addition to fluctuating, Tabby's Star has been getting dimmer overall. It'south as if the star is slowly being enveloped.

What originally grabbed the attention of astronomers was the size and duration of the dips in light output. Kepler tries to detect new exoplanets via the transit method. It just watches for minor dips in luminosity when a planet passes in front end of its host star. These dips are tiny — usually less than a percentage and last only a few hours. The offset dip detected from KIC 8462852 blocked virtually 1% of its light (like a large gas giant), but it lasted more than than a calendar week. That was just the showtime, though. Kepler detected more drops in lite output from Tabby's Star every bit big as 20%, which is huge.

The latest data indicate comes from Caltech astronomer Ben Montet and Joshua Simon from the Carnegie Constitute. The pair conducted an exhaustive photometric analysis of the data collected past Kepler during its iv years of observing KIC 8462852 and other stars in that surface area of the sky. They establish that, yes, the huge dips that astronomers have been puzzling over are there in the original information. More than importantly, its full light output has been dropping over fourth dimension at a not-linear charge per unit.

light graph

For the first 1000 days of Kepler'south observation, Tabby'south Star was losing 0.34% brightness annually. In the 200 days following that, it dropped by 2% earlier leveling off. A total drib of 3% (in addition to the transit-like drops of upward to xx%) is incredibly bizarre. A few months agone, astronomer Bradley Schaefer of Louisiana Country University claimed that an exam of old photographic plates of Tabby'south Star indicated that its effulgence had dropped past virtually xx% in the last century. Other scientists were skeptical of this claim, but now we take some corroboration that Tabby's Star is indeed getting dimmer overall. Montet and Simon even looked at 500 stars in the vicinity of KIC 8462852 to confirm that none of them were behaving in a similar way.

What we have hither is a genuine astronomical mystery. We just don't know what's going on in orbit of Tabby's Star. None of the natural mechanisms scientists take presented can completely explicate the information. If this sounds like something out of science fiction, that's because it is. The thought of a massive structure encasing a star has been around for decades — information technology's known as a Dyson Sphere. In fact, astronomical observations very similar to what nosotros see at KIC 8462852 are described in a number of sci-fi novels (Pandora's Star comes to mind). Mayhap this is life imitating art.